Qiana J. Whitted
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • CV
  • Blog
  • Contact

Should We Describe Comics Rather Than Define Them?

11/30/2012

 
Picture
Originally posted at Pencil Panel Page.

In an essay that Samuel R. Delany published in 1996 on “The Politics of Paraliterary Criticism,” the science fiction writer closes with a call for comics scholars to abandon the idea of “definitions” and “origins” as a scholarly imperative. Not surprisingly, Delany used Scott McCloud as the catalyst for his argument and while the essay praises much of Understanding Comics, he stridently challenges the premise of the book’s opening chapter in which McCloud settles upon the formulation of comics as “juxtaposed pictorial and other images in deliberate sequence, intended to convey information and/or to produce an aesthetic response in the viewer.” Critics have since deliberated untiringly over McCloud’s words, but Delany takes issue with the entire definitional project altogether. He characterizes the enterprise as a series of “empty gestures” from the 1930s when “American critics wanted to make literary criticism more scientific” and that ultimately reinforce the false notion that paraliterature genres lack the quality and complexity of literary works (Shorter Views 239-240).

Delany advocates a different approach to genre collections such as comics, handling them as “social objects” that are incompatible with rigorous definitions and instead, “exist rather as an unspecified number of recognition codes (functional descriptions, if you will) shared by an unlimited population, in which new and different examples are regularly produced” (239). Many scholars seem to have followed Delany’s lead and left the constraints of definitions behind in the nearly two decades since Understanding Comics was published. Even our little corner of the blogosphere at PPP privileges “functional description” (see posts here, here, here, here and here). “A discipline is defined by its object,” Delany says, “But disciplinary objects themselves are not definable. That’s why they must be so carefully and repeatedly described” (212).


Read More
    Picture

    About

    An archive of my online writing on comics, literature, and culture. (Illustration above by Seth!)

    Categories

    All
    Adaptations
    Aesthetics And Style
    Anthropomorphism
    Brazilian Comics
    Caricature
    Comics And Gender
    Comics And Music
    Comics And The South
    Comics Research
    Defining Comics
    Django Unchained
    EC Comics
    Editorial Cartoons
    Empathy And Emotion
    Events
    Indie Comics
    Interview
    Reader Response
    Romance

    Archives

    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2019
    August 2018
    March 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    March 2017
    December 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    August 2011

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • CV
  • Blog
  • Contact